data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5accc/5accc68bc2b5e7c0952f3051caabf2049447b10b" alt="LIVESTREAM: RJS’ thorough analysis on City Council redistricting"
LIVESTREAM: RJS’ thorough analysis on City Council redistricting
Four organizers from within the Redistricting Justice for Seattle (RJS) Coalition will analyze Seattle’s 2022 redistricting results, process, and what it means for the future of Seattle City Council.
The Redistricting Commission finalized their map on Nov. 8 after a slew of proposals. Now…
Seattle Redistricting Commission Finalizes First-Ever Redistricting Map, A Win for Renters and BIPOC Communities
The five-member nonpartisan Seattle Redistricting Commission voted to finalize Seattle’s first-ever redistricting map plan.
The Commission voted 4-1 on the plan, with former Seattle mayor and Commissioner Gregory Nickels dissenting because Magnolia was split between Districts 6 and 7, a major point of contention in the waning days of the process.
The final map does not…
Redistricting Commission Proposes Dividing UW renter, BIPOC communities in 11th Hour
After initially promising to only make minor changes to the District 6 and 7 boundary at their previous meeting, the Seattle Redistricting Commission voted to consider two different amendments to their final draft map plan that split the University of Washington from the neighboring University District.
These amendments come just 6 days before the Commission takes a final vote…
Overwhelming Support for Coalition Maps as Redistricting Commission Considers
On Saturday, October 8, the Seattle Redistricting Commission held its final public forum for Seattleites to give feedback on their Seattle City Council draft map proposals. Over the course of the two-hour forum, over three-quarters of testifiers urged the Commission to adopt Redistricting Justice for Seattle (RJS) coalition’s map proposal.
“After overwhelming citywide interest and support for the RJS map throughout this whole process, the Seattle Redistricting Commission should live up to their commitment to a public-informed and -led process by adopting the RJS map,” said coalition leader Andrew Hong…
Community groups applaud Seattle Redistricting Commission’s first official map proposal
The Commissioners—who named respecting communities of interest as a primary concern—landed on a map plan that reflects most of the Redistricting Justice for Seattle (RJS) coalition’s top priorities.
“After five months of organizing across Seattle, our coalition is happy to see that Commissioners listened to our city’s historically excluded residents,” wrote the RJS coalition. “We are thrilled to see Commissioners themselves voice the importance of keeping historically redlined and disproportionately impacted communities intact and empowered.”
The Commission’s singular draft map proposal mirrors…
RJS Coalition proposes Seattle City Council redistricting map, centers marginalized communities
As Seattle Redistricting Commissioners release their individual proposals, the Redistricting Justice for Seattle (RJS) coalition—in the interest of increased community engagement, transparency, and equity—has submitted its own map proposal, which resulted from engaging over 200 Seattleites and over 20 community-based organizations. (The proposal in its entirety, as submitted to the Commission, can be viewed here.)
“We want to help the Commission hear everyone’s voices, not just the more privileged folks who have the time,” wrote Andrew Hong, RJS coordinator. “So we engaged communities of color beyond slated public forums to ensure equity in the process. Our map was drawn by community to keep communities of interest together.”
RJS organizers stressed the importance of including Seattle’s often excluded neighborhoods in redistricting—ones that historically faced both physical urban planning and nonphysical districting division, like South Seattle, Chinatown-International District, and the Central District.
“Neighborhoods should be kept together, not divided,” Joseph Lachman of Asian Counseling and Referral Service said. “Whether it’s highways built to demolish and split physical neighborhoods populated by communities of color or it’s districting to dilute and split the votes of those same communities, the outcomes are the same. Dividing us up inflicts harm and cements inequity.”
Washington’s Redistricting Process Must Change
It’s plain disrespectful that commissioners who decide the fate of our entire state’s electoral system only have to pay $500 fines each for making their decisions illegally, in private, and yet we’re continuing to use the maps they created in that illegal process. This is a flagrant violation of the law with zero consequence. Not to mention how such decisions pointedly dismiss the negative impacts these maps will have on majority-minority areas.
The maps created in closed-door, partisan deal-making ultimately remove voting power from communities of color across Washington state; They should not and never should have been used or validated in our state’s redistricting process. Washingtonians deserve new, fair, and legal map proposals, but our systems have denied that.
A Letter to Legislators
…pass Senate Bill 5560 because of the mistakes that were made on November 15th, 2021 during the final hour…But it would be a disrespect to Washingtonians to stop addressing the large structural problems in our redistricting process at SB 5560.
WA Supreme Court accepts redistricting maps that violate Voting Rights Act
“We are disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision not to intervene. The Court's decision might be a procedural one, but it has substantive ramifications for our democracy. The maps produced by the Commission were found to likely violate the voting rights of communities in Central Washington. The Commission lacks credibility and their final maps are a stain on our democracy that can’t be ignored. Washingtonians deserve better.”
Redistricting Commission’s late maps fail communities of color
UCLA Voting Rights Project finds that not only did the Washington state Redistricting Commission fail to meet its constitutional deadline, the maps they subsequently released also likely fail to comply with the United States Constitution, the Federal Voting Rights Act (VRA), and Washington State law redistricting requirements…
Redistricting Commission fails to pass maps by Nov. 15th deadline
“The Redistricting Commission not only failed to meet the statutory deadline, but it also declined to interact with the public during public meetings, limited accessibility…They must draw districts, particularly in Yakima, that respect the sovereignty of the Yakama Nation…”
8 things to look for ahead of the final map announcement
Ahead of the announcement, here are eight of the most consequential decisions to look out for. 1) Central WA Latino communities & Voting Rights Act…
Community coalition calls on all commissioners to redraw maps due to likely violation of voting rights
“In 48 out of the current 49 legislative districts, white voters constitute a majority of the eligible electorate, even though people of color are a third of Washington State’s population. And in none of the legislative districts do Latinos make up a majority of the electorate…”
Majority-minority districts: Why CVAP is key to voting justice
Majority-minority districts get a little more complicated when we consider that the whole population in a district aren’t necessarily all eligible voters: In a district where people of color are 55% of the population, they may only be 45% of the voting base…
WA redistricting map drafts reveal disputes over voting rights for communities of color
The Washington State Redistricting Commission released their proposed maps for Washington’s new congressional districts…Demographic analysis provided by Redistricting Justice of Washington shows key places in Washington State where members of the Commission differ on how communities of color should be represented.
Statement on the appointment of Joe Fain to the Redistricting Commission
RJW stands in solidarity with groups and individuals who have expressed their support with survivors of sexual assault. We join in their demands for the commission’s accountability…Our coalition explicitly demands a code of conduct that takes into account the respect of coworkers and colleagues. Neither Joe Fain, nor anyone accused of sexual assault, fits that scope…